Cyprus vs Marshall Islands: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Cyprus
88
in 2019
Marshall Islands
92
in 2019
Cyprus rank
3rd
Marshall Islands rank
1st

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Cyprus
  • Marshall Islands
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 92 against 88 in Cyprus, a difference of 4.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 3rd and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 86 92 6 Marshall Islands
2010s 88 92 4 Marshall Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Cyprus or Marshall Islands?
Marshall Islands, at 92 against 88 in Cyprus as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Cyprus and Marshall Islands?
4, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Marshall Islands?
12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
How do Cyprus and Marshall Islands rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Cyprus ranks 3rd and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.