Denmark vs Djibouti: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Denmark
92
in 2019
Djibouti
56
in 2019
Denmark rank
1st
Djibouti rank
1st

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Denmark
  • Djibouti
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 92 against 56 in Djibouti, a difference of 36.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.6 times Djibouti's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 1st and Djibouti ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Djibouti Difference Ahead
2000s 92 58.4 33.6 Denmark
2010s 92 54 38 Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Denmark or Djibouti?
Denmark, at 92 against 56 in Djibouti as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Denmark and Djibouti?
36, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Djibouti?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Denmark and Djibouti rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Denmark ranks 1st and Djibouti ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.