Denmark vs Kosovo: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Denmark
92
in 2019
Kosovo
48
in 2019
Denmark rank
1st
Kosovo rank
1st

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Denmark
  • Kosovo
406080100200520122019

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 92 against 48 in Kosovo, a difference of 44.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.9 times Kosovo's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 1st and Kosovo ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Kosovo Difference Ahead
2000s 92 44 48 Denmark
2010s 92 38.4 53.6 Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Denmark or Kosovo?
Denmark, at 92 against 48 in Kosovo as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Denmark and Kosovo?
44, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Kosovo?
11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Denmark and Kosovo rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Denmark ranks 1st and Kosovo ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.