Djibouti vs Sao Tome and Principe: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Djibouti
56
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
56
in 2019
Djibouti rank
107th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
107th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Djibouti
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 56 against 56 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 107th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 107th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.4 | 56 | 2.4 | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 54 | 56 | 2 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Djibouti or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Djibouti, at 56 against 56 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Djibouti and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Djibouti and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Djibouti ranks 107th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 107th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.