Dominican Republic vs Grenada: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Dominican Republic
60
in 2019
Grenada
60
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
92nd
Grenada rank
92nd
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- Grenada
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 60 against 60 in Grenada, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 92nd and Grenada ranks 92nd of 188 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68 | 60 | 8 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 64.8 | 60 | 4.8 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Dominican Republic or Grenada?
- Dominican Republic, at 60 against 60 in Grenada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Dominican Republic and Grenada?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Grenada?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Dominican Republic and Grenada rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 92nd and Grenada ranks 92nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.