Dominican Republic vs Rwanda: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Dominican Republic
60
in 2019
Rwanda
60
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
92nd
Rwanda rank
92nd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Rwanda
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 60 against 60 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Rwanda ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 92nd and Rwanda ranks 92nd of 188 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 68 71.2 3.2 Rwanda
2010s 64.8 66 1.2 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Dominican Republic or Rwanda?
Dominican Republic, at 60 against 60 in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Dominican Republic and Rwanda?
0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Rwanda?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Dominican Republic and Rwanda rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Dominican Republic ranks 92nd and Rwanda ranks 92nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.