Dominican Republic vs Vanuatu: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Dominican Republic
60
in 2019
Vanuatu
60
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
92nd
Vanuatu rank
92nd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Vanuatu
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 60 against 60 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Vanuatu ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 92nd and Vanuatu ranks 92nd of 188 countries.

Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 68 92 24 Vanuatu
2010s 64.8 66 1.2 Vanuatu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Dominican Republic or Vanuatu?
Dominican Republic, at 60 against 60 in Vanuatu as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Dominican Republic and Vanuatu?
0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Vanuatu?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Dominican Republic and Vanuatu rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Dominican Republic ranks 92nd and Vanuatu ranks 92nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.