Ecuador vs Slovenia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Ecuador
52
in 2019
Slovenia
52
in 2019
Ecuador rank
123rd
Slovenia rank
123rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Ecuador
  • Slovenia
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 52 against 52 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 123rd and Slovenia ranks 123rd of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 52 44.8 7.2 Ecuador
2010s 52 50.8 1.2 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Ecuador or Slovenia?
Ecuador, at 52 against 52 in Slovenia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Ecuador and Slovenia?
0, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Slovenia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Slovenia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Ecuador ranks 123rd and Slovenia ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.