Estonia vs Vietnam: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Estonia
80
in 2019
Vietnam
80
in 2019
Estonia rank
15th
Vietnam rank
15th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Estonia
  • Vietnam
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 80 against 80 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 15th and Vietnam ranks 15th of 188 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Vietnam Difference Ahead
2000s 82.4 80 2.4 Estonia
2010s 80 80 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Estonia or Vietnam?
Estonia, at 80 against 80 in Vietnam as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Estonia and Vietnam?
0, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Vietnam?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Estonia and Vietnam rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Estonia ranks 15th and Vietnam ranks 15th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.