Gabon vs Guinea-Bissau: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Gabon
68
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau
68
in 2019
Gabon rank
55th
Guinea-Bissau rank
55th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Gabon
  • Guinea-Bissau
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 68 against 68 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Gabon ranks 55th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 55th of 188 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 64 68 4 Guinea-Bissau
2010s 65.2 68 2.8 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Gabon or Guinea-Bissau?
Gabon, at 68 against 68 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Gabon and Guinea-Bissau?
0, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Guinea-Bissau?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Gabon and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Gabon ranks 55th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.