Georgia vs United Arab Emirates: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Georgia
76
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
76
in 2019
Georgia rank
27th
United Arab Emirates rank
27th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Georgia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 76 against 76 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Georgia ranks 27th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.6 | 51.2 | 5.6 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 73.2 | 70.4 | 2.8 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Georgia or United Arab Emirates?
- Georgia, at 76 against 76 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Georgia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and United Arab Emirates?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Georgia ranks 27th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.