Greece vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Greece
52
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
52
in 2019
Greece rank
123rd
Papua New Guinea rank
123rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Greece
  • Papua New Guinea
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Greece currently reports 52 against 52 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Greece ahead.

Greece ranks 123rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 123rd of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 60 52 8 Greece
2010s 51.2 52 0.8 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Greece or Papua New Guinea?
Greece, at 52 against 52 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Greece and Papua New Guinea?
0, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Papua New Guinea?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Greece and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Greece ranks 123rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.