Guatemala vs Luxembourg: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Guatemala
76
in 2019
Luxembourg
76
in 2019
Guatemala rank
27th
Luxembourg rank
27th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Guatemala
  • Luxembourg
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 76 against 76 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Guatemala ranks 27th and Luxembourg ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 49 76 27 Luxembourg
2010s 72 76 4 Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Guatemala or Luxembourg?
Guatemala, at 76 against 76 in Luxembourg as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Guatemala and Luxembourg?
0, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Luxembourg?
14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
How do Guatemala and Luxembourg rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Guatemala ranks 27th and Luxembourg ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.