Guinea-Bissau vs Switzerland: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Guinea-Bissau
68
in 2019
Switzerland
68
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
55th
Switzerland rank
55th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Switzerland
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 68 against 68 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 55th and Switzerland ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68 | 64 | 4 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 68 | 67.2 | 0.8 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Switzerland?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 68 against 68 in Switzerland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Switzerland?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Switzerland?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Switzerland rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 55th and Switzerland ranks 55th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.