Guinea vs Iran, Islamic Rep.: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Guinea
56
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Rep.
56
in 2019
Guinea rank
107th
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
107th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Guinea
  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 56 against 56 in Iran, Islamic Rep., a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 107th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 107th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Iran, Islamic Rep. in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Iran, Islamic Rep. Difference Ahead
2000s 60 53.6 6.4 Guinea
2010s 58.4 58.8 0.4 Iran, Islamic Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Guinea or Iran, Islamic Rep.?
Guinea, at 56 against 56 in Iran, Islamic Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Guinea and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
0, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Guinea and Iran, Islamic Rep. rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Guinea ranks 107th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 107th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.