Guyana vs Jamaica: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Guyana
48
in 2019
Jamaica
48
in 2019
Guyana rank
143rd
Jamaica rank
143rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Guyana
  • Jamaica
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 48 against 48 in Jamaica, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guyana ahead.

Guyana ranks 143rd and Jamaica ranks 143rd of 188 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Jamaica Difference Ahead
2000s 53.6 60 6.4 Jamaica
2010s 48 51.6 3.6 Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Guyana or Jamaica?
Guyana, at 48 against 48 in Jamaica as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Guyana and Jamaica?
0, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Jamaica?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Guyana and Jamaica rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Guyana ranks 143rd and Jamaica ranks 143rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.