Hong Kong, China vs Marshall Islands: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Hong Kong, China
88
in 2019
Marshall Islands
92
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 92 against 88 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 4.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.6 | 92 | 50.4 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 81.6 | 92 | 10.4 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Hong Kong, China or Marshall Islands?
- Marshall Islands, at 92 against 88 in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Hong Kong, China and Marshall Islands?
- 4, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Marshall Islands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Marshall Islands rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.