Hong Kong vs United Kingdom: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Hong Kong
88
in 2019
United Kingdom
84
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
3rd
United Kingdom rank
6th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Hong Kong
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 88 against 84 in United Kingdom, a difference of 4.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 3rd and United Kingdom ranks 6th of 191 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.6 | 58.4 | 16.8 | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 81.6 | 84 | 2.4 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Hong Kong or United Kingdom?
- Hong Kong, at 88 against 84 in United Kingdom as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Hong Kong and United Kingdom?
- 4, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and United Kingdom?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and United Kingdom rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Hong Kong ranks 3rd and United Kingdom ranks 6th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.