Indonesia vs Nicaragua: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Indonesia
48
in 2019
Nicaragua
48
in 2019
Indonesia rank
143rd
Nicaragua rank
143rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Indonesia
  • Nicaragua
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 48 against 48 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Indonesia ahead.

Indonesia ranks 143rd and Nicaragua ranks 143rd of 188 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Nicaragua Difference Ahead
2000s 52 48 4 Indonesia
2010s 50.8 48 2.8 Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Indonesia or Nicaragua?
Indonesia, at 48 against 48 in Nicaragua as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Indonesia and Nicaragua?
0, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Nicaragua?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Indonesia and Nicaragua rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Indonesia ranks 143rd and Nicaragua ranks 143rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.