Indonesia vs Pakistan: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Indonesia
48
in 2019
Pakistan
51.8
in 2019
Indonesia rank
143rd
Pakistan rank
142nd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Indonesia
  • Pakistan
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 51.8 against 48 in Indonesia, a difference of 3.8.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Pakistan ahead.

Indonesia ranks 143rd and Pakistan ranks 142nd of 188 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Pakistan Difference Ahead
2000s 52 52 0
2010s 50.8 47.58 3.22 Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Indonesia or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 51.8 against 48 in Indonesia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Indonesia and Pakistan?
3.8, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Pakistan?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Indonesia and Pakistan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Indonesia ranks 143rd and Pakistan ranks 142nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.