Ireland vs South Korea: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Ireland
80
in 2019
South Korea
80
in 2019
Ireland rank
15th
South Korea rank
15th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Ireland
  • South Korea
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 80 against 80 in South Korea, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

Ireland ranks 15th and South Korea ranks 15th of 188 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland South Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 76 84 8 South Korea
2010s 78.4 80.4 2 South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Ireland or South Korea?
Ireland, at 80 against 80 in South Korea as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Ireland and South Korea?
0, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and South Korea?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Ireland and South Korea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Ireland ranks 15th and South Korea ranks 15th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.