Korea, Rep. vs Lesotho: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Korea, Rep.
80
in 2019
Lesotho
80
in 2019
Korea, Rep. rank
15th
Lesotho rank
15th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Korea, Rep.
  • Lesotho
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Korea, Rep. currently reports 80 against 80 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Korea, Rep. ahead.

Korea, Rep. ranks 15th and Lesotho ranks 15th of 188 countries.

Korea, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea, Rep. Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 84 76 8 Korea, Rep.
2010s 80.4 77.2 3.2 Korea, Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Korea, Rep. or Lesotho?
Korea, Rep., at 80 against 80 in Lesotho as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Korea, Rep. and Lesotho?
0, with Korea, Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea, Rep. and Lesotho?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Korea, Rep. and Lesotho rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Korea, Rep. ranks 15th and Lesotho ranks 15th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.