Kyrgyzstan vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Kyrgyzstan
52
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
52
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
124th
Papua New Guinea rank
124th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 52 against 52 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.2 | 52 | 20.8 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 53.6 | 52 | 1.6 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Kyrgyzstan or Papua New Guinea?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 52 against 52 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 124th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.