Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Lesotho
80
in 2019
Zimbabwe
80
in 2019
Lesotho rank
15th
Zimbabwe rank
15th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Lesotho
  • Zimbabwe
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 80 against 80 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Lesotho ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 188 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 76 80 4 Zimbabwe
2010s 77.2 80 2.8 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Lesotho or Zimbabwe?
Lesotho, at 80 against 80 in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
0, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Lesotho and Zimbabwe rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Lesotho ranks 15th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.