Liberia vs Romania: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Liberia
20
in 2019
Romania
24
in 2019
Liberia rank
182nd
Romania rank
180th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Liberia
  • Romania
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Romania currently reports 24 against 20 in Liberia, a difference of 4.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Liberia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Liberia ranks 182nd and Romania ranks 180th of 188 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 20 48 28 Romania
2010s 20 26.4 6.4 Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Liberia or Romania?
Romania, at 24 against 20 in Liberia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Liberia and Romania?
4, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Romania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
How do Liberia and Romania rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Liberia ranks 182nd and Romania ranks 180th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.