Luxembourg vs Serbia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Luxembourg
76
in 2019
Serbia
76
in 2019
Luxembourg rank
27th
Serbia rank
27th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Serbia
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 76 against 76 in Serbia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 27th and Serbia ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 76 48 28 Luxembourg
2010s 76 57.2 18.8 Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Luxembourg or Serbia?
Luxembourg, at 76 against 76 in Serbia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Luxembourg and Serbia?
0, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
How do Luxembourg and Serbia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Luxembourg ranks 27th and Serbia ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.