Madagascar vs Slovenia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Madagascar
52
in 2019
Slovenia
52
in 2019
Madagascar rank
123rd
Slovenia rank
123rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Madagascar
  • Slovenia
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 52 against 52 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 123rd and Slovenia ranks 123rd of 188 countries.

Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 64 44.8 19.2 Madagascar
2010s 56.4 50.8 5.6 Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Madagascar or Slovenia?
Madagascar, at 52 against 52 in Slovenia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Madagascar and Slovenia?
0, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Slovenia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Madagascar and Slovenia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Madagascar ranks 123rd and Slovenia ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.