Malaysia vs Montenegro: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Malaysia
84
in 2019
Montenegro
84
in 2019
Malaysia rank
6th
Montenegro rank
6th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Malaysia
  • Montenegro
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 84 against 84 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 6th and Montenegro ranks 6th of 188 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 36 65 29 Montenegro
2010s 56 82.4 26.4 Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Malaysia or Montenegro?
Malaysia, at 84 against 84 in Montenegro as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Malaysia and Montenegro?
0, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
How do Malaysia and Montenegro rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Malaysia ranks 6th and Montenegro ranks 6th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.