Malaysia vs United Kingdom: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Malaysia
84
in 2019
United Kingdom
84
in 2019
Malaysia rank
6th
United Kingdom rank
6th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Malaysia
  • United Kingdom
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 84 against 84 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 6th and United Kingdom ranks 6th of 188 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 36 58.4 22.4 United Kingdom
2010s 56 84 28 United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Malaysia or United Kingdom?
Malaysia, at 84 against 84 in United Kingdom as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Malaysia and United Kingdom?
0, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and United Kingdom?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Malaysia and United Kingdom rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Malaysia ranks 6th and United Kingdom ranks 6th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.