Mauritius vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Mauritius
72
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
72
in 2019
Mauritius rank
41st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
41st
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 72 against 72 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 41st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 188 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.4 | 72 | 17.6 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 59.2 | 72 | 12.8 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Mauritius or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Mauritius, at 72 against 72 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 41st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.