Mexico vs Rwanda: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Mexico
61.36
in 2019
Rwanda
60
in 2019
Mexico rank
90th
Rwanda rank
92nd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Mexico
  • Rwanda
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 61.36 against 60 in Rwanda, a difference of 1.36.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Rwanda ahead.

Mexico ranks 90th and Rwanda ranks 92nd of 188 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 66.4 71.2 4.8 Rwanda
2010s 60.95 66 5.05 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Mexico or Rwanda?
Mexico, at 61.36 against 60 in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Mexico and Rwanda?
1.36, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Rwanda?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Mexico and Rwanda rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Mexico ranks 90th and Rwanda ranks 92nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.