Micronesia, Fed. Sts. vs Senegal: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
64
in 2019
Senegal
64
in 2019
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. rank
70th
Senegal rank
70th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
  • Senegal
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Micronesia, Fed. Sts. currently reports 64 against 64 in Senegal, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.

Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ranks 70th and Senegal ranks 70th of 188 countries.

Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia, Fed. Sts. Senegal Difference Ahead
2000s 64 68 4 Senegal
2010s 64 64 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Micronesia, Fed. Sts. or Senegal?
Micronesia, Fed. Sts., at 64 against 64 in Senegal as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Micronesia, Fed. Sts. and Senegal?
0, with Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Fed. Sts. and Senegal?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Micronesia, Fed. Sts. and Senegal rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ranks 70th and Senegal ranks 70th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.