Micronesia (country) vs Thailand: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Micronesia (country)
64
in 2019
Thailand
64
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
70th
Thailand rank
70th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Thailand
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 64 against 64 in Thailand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Micronesia (country) ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 70th and Thailand ranks 70th of 188 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64 | 44 | 20 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 64 | 46 | 18 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Micronesia (country) or Thailand?
- Micronesia (country), at 64 against 64 in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Micronesia (country) and Thailand?
- 0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Thailand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Thailand rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 70th and Thailand ranks 70th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.