Mongolia vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Mongolia
52
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
52
in 2019
Mongolia rank
123rd
Papua New Guinea rank
123rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Mongolia
  • Papua New Guinea
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 52 against 52 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 123rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 123rd of 188 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 40 52 12 Papua New Guinea
2010s 49.6 52 2.4 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Mongolia or Papua New Guinea?
Mongolia, at 52 against 52 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Mongolia and Papua New Guinea?
0, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Papua New Guinea?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Mongolia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Mongolia ranks 123rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.