Netherlands vs Qatar: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Netherlands
68
in 2019
Qatar
68
in 2019
Netherlands rank
55th
Qatar rank
55th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Netherlands
  • Qatar
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 68 against 68 in Qatar, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Netherlands ahead.

Netherlands ranks 55th and Qatar ranks 55th of 188 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s 64 52 12 Netherlands
2010s 67.2 60 7.2 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Netherlands or Qatar?
Netherlands, at 68 against 68 in Qatar as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Netherlands and Qatar?
0, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Qatar?
13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
How do Netherlands and Qatar rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Netherlands ranks 55th and Qatar ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.