Pakistan vs Samoa: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Pakistan
51.8
in 2019
Samoa
48
in 2019
Pakistan rank
142nd
Samoa rank
143rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Pakistan
  • Samoa
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 51.8 against 48 in Samoa, a difference of 3.8.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 142nd and Samoa ranks 143rd of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 52 48 4 Pakistan
2010s 47.58 48 0.42 Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Pakistan or Samoa?
Pakistan, at 51.8 against 48 in Samoa as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Pakistan and Samoa?
3.8, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Samoa?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Pakistan and Samoa rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Pakistan ranks 142nd and Samoa ranks 143rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.