Papua New Guinea vs Uzbekistan: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Papua New Guinea
52
in 2019
Uzbekistan
52
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
124th
Uzbekistan rank
124th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 52 against 52 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 124th and Uzbekistan ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52 | 32 | 20 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 52 | 38 | 14 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Papua New Guinea or Uzbekistan?
- Papua New Guinea, at 52 against 52 in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Papua New Guinea and Uzbekistan?
- 0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Uzbekistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Uzbekistan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 124th and Uzbekistan ranks 124th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.