Romania vs Tajikistan: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Romania
24
in 2019
Tajikistan
16
in 2019
Romania rank
180th
Tajikistan rank
183rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Romania
  • Tajikistan
1020304050200520122019

How they compare

Romania currently reports 24 against 16 in Tajikistan, a difference of 8.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.5 times Tajikistan's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Romania ranks 180th and Tajikistan ranks 183rd of 188 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Tajikistan Difference Ahead
2000s 48.8 8.8 40 Romania
2010s 26.4 16 10.4 Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Romania or Tajikistan?
Romania, at 24 against 16 in Tajikistan as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Romania and Tajikistan?
8, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Tajikistan?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Romania and Tajikistan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Romania ranks 180th and Tajikistan ranks 183rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.