Russia vs Thailand: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Russia
67.6
in 2019
Thailand
64
in 2019
Russia rank
69th
Thailand rank
70th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Russia
  • Thailand
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Russia currently reports 67.6 against 64 in Thailand, a difference of 3.6.

That makes Russia's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Thailand ahead.

Russia ranks 69th and Thailand ranks 70th of 188 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russia Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s 0 44 44 Thailand
2010s 43.2 46 2.8 Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Russia or Thailand?
Russia, at 67.6 against 64 in Thailand as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Russia and Thailand?
3.6, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Thailand?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Russia and Thailand rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Russia ranks 69th and Thailand ranks 70th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.