Serbia vs United Arab Emirates: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score (Score)
Serbia
76
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
76
in 2019
Serbia rank
27th
United Arab Emirates rank
27th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score (Score) over time
- Serbia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 76 against 76 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Serbia ranks 27th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.2 | 51.2 | 4 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 57.2 | 70.4 | 13.2 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Serbia or United Arab Emirates?
- Serbia, at 76 against 76 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Serbia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and United Arab Emirates?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Serbia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Serbia ranks 27th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.