Slovenia vs Uzbekistan, Republic of: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Slovenia
52
in 2019
Uzbekistan, Republic of
52
in 2019
Slovenia rank
124th
Uzbekistan, Republic of rank
124th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Slovenia
- Uzbekistan, Republic of
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 52 against 52 in Uzbekistan, Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 124th and Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 124th of 190 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Uzbekistan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.8 | 32 | 12.8 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 50.8 | 38 | 12.8 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Slovenia or Uzbekistan, Republic of?
- Slovenia, at 52 against 52 in Uzbekistan, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Slovenia and Uzbekistan, Republic of?
- 0, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Uzbekistan, Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Slovenia and Uzbekistan, Republic of rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Slovenia ranks 124th and Uzbekistan, Republic of ranks 124th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.