Solomon Islands vs Tunisia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Solomon Islands
64
in 2019
Tunisia
64
in 2019
Solomon Islands rank
70th
Tunisia rank
70th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • Tunisia
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 64 against 64 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Solomon Islands ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 70th of 188 countries.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 64 60 4 Solomon Islands
2010s 64 63.2 0.8 Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Solomon Islands or Tunisia?
Solomon Islands, at 64 against 64 in Tunisia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Solomon Islands and Tunisia?
0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Tunisia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Solomon Islands and Tunisia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Solomon Islands ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 70th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.