South Africa vs Palestine, State of: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
South Africa
40
in 2019
Palestine, State of
40
in 2019
South Africa rank
165th
Palestine, State of rank
165th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- South Africa
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 40 against 40 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 165th and Palestine, State of ranks 165th of 191 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48 | 36 | 12 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 43.2 | 38 | 5.2 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, South Africa or Palestine, State of?
- South Africa, at 40 against 40 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between South Africa and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Palestine, State of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Palestine, State of rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- South Africa ranks 165th and Palestine, State of ranks 165th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.