Spain vs Switzerland: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Spain
68
in 2019
Switzerland
68
in 2019
Spain rank
55th
Switzerland rank
55th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Spain
  • Switzerland
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Spain currently reports 68 against 68 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Spain ahead.

Spain ranks 55th and Switzerland ranks 55th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 64.8 64 0.8 Spain
2010s 66 67.2 1.2 Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Spain or Switzerland?
Spain, at 68 against 68 in Switzerland as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Spain and Switzerland?
0, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Switzerland?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Spain and Switzerland rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Spain ranks 55th and Switzerland ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.