Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Togo: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score (Score)
Saint Kitts and Nevis
72
in 2019
Togo
72
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
41st
Togo rank
41st
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score (Score) over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Togo
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 72 against 72 in Togo, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st and Togo ranks 41st of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72 | 68 | 4 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 72 | 70.4 | 1.6 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Togo?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 72 against 72 in Togo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Togo?
- 0, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Togo?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Togo rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 41st and Togo ranks 41st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.