Saint Lucia vs Tunisia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Saint Lucia
64
in 2019
Tunisia
64
in 2019
Saint Lucia rank
70th
Tunisia rank
70th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Saint Lucia
  • Tunisia
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 64 against 64 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Saint Lucia ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 70th of 188 countries.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Lucia Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 64 60 4 Saint Lucia
2010s 64 63.2 0.8 Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Saint Lucia or Tunisia?
Saint Lucia, at 64 against 64 in Tunisia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Saint Lucia and Tunisia?
0, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Tunisia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Saint Lucia and Tunisia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Saint Lucia ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 70th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.