Thailand vs Tunisia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Thailand
64
in 2019
Tunisia
64
in 2019
Thailand rank
70th
Tunisia rank
70th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Thailand
  • Tunisia
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 64 against 64 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Thailand ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 70th of 188 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Thailand Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 44 60 16 Tunisia
2010s 46 63.2 17.2 Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Thailand or Tunisia?
Thailand, at 64 against 64 in Tunisia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Thailand and Tunisia?
0, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Tunisia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Thailand and Tunisia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Thailand ranks 70th and Tunisia ranks 70th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.