United Arab Emirates vs Venezuela: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
United Arab Emirates
76
in 2019
Venezuela
76
in 2019
United Arab Emirates rank
27th
Venezuela rank
27th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- United Arab Emirates
- Venezuela
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 76 against 76 in Venezuela, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Venezuela ahead.
United Arab Emirates ranks 27th and Venezuela ranks 27th of 190 countries.
Venezuela has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Arab Emirates | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.2 | 76 | 24.8 | Venezuela |
| 2010s | 70.4 | 76 | 5.6 | Venezuela |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, United Arab Emirates or Venezuela?
- United Arab Emirates, at 76 against 76 in Venezuela as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between United Arab Emirates and Venezuela?
- 0, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and Venezuela?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do United Arab Emirates and Venezuela rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 27th and Venezuela ranks 27th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.