Chile vs Namibia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures over time
- Chile
- Namibia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 12 number against 12 number in Namibia, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 131st and Namibia ranks 131st of 185 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14 number | 12 number | 2 number | Chile |
| 2010s | 12.2 number | 12 number | 0.2 number | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures, Chile or Namibia?
- Chile, at 12 number against 12 number in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures between Chile and Namibia?
- 0 number, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Namibia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Namibia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures?
- Chile ranks 131st and Namibia ranks 131st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The number of procedures records all interactions of the building company’s employees or any party acting on its behalf with external parties, including government agencies, notaries, the land registry, the cadastre, utility companies and public inspectors. Procedures that the company undergoes to connect the warehouse to water and sewerage are included. All procedures that are legally required and that are done in practice by a majority of companies are counted, even if they may be avoided in exceptional cases.