Cote d'Ivoire vs Romania: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures

Cote d'Ivoire
22 number
in 2019
Romania
24 number
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
6th
Romania rank
3rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Romania
0102030200520122019

How they compare

Romania currently reports 24 number against 22 number in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 2 number.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Cote d'Ivoire's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 6th and Romania ranks 3rd of 185 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 25.2 number 17.8 number 7.4 number Cote d'Ivoire
2010s 24.2 number 23.4 number 0.8 number Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures, Cote d'Ivoire or Romania?
Romania, at 24 number against 22 number in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures between Cote d'Ivoire and Romania?
2 number, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Romania?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Romania rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 6th and Romania ranks 3rd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 2,740 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The number of procedures records all interactions of the building company’s employees or any party acting on its behalf with external parties, including government agencies, notaries, the land registry, the cadastre, utility companies and public inspectors. Procedures that the company undergoes to connect the warehouse to water and sewerage are included. All procedures that are legally required and that are done in practice by a majority of companies are counted, even if they may be avoided in exceptional cases.